Monthly Archives: May 2009

Wendy Kopp, why is TFA abducting so many Hoyas?

This weekend is Mr. D’s 10-year college reunion.  It’s been a while since I visited old Georgetown University, and it’ll be good to catch up with my old gang.  We’re all older, fatter, balder, on more medication–but probably not wiser.  That’s not necessarily a bad thing.

Reading a recent article in Education Week, it appears that the old alma mater is getting recognized in another category: recruiting for Teach for America. 

For my casual readers in the Neighborhood, let me just say that TFA and I have an understanding.  Ever since my last rant at the institution, it may be best that we stay out of each others way.  You wouldn’t want to see me at Wendy Kopp’s cocktail party, that’s for sure.  The johnny-come-latelys of the TFA crowd, who cry that I’m a tool of the unions and unsympathetic to the plight of children, can cram it, for all I care.

I don’t like holding a grudge, though.  First of all, TFA is too easy a punching bag.  Many of the blogs linked on my page and on others do a far better job of deflating the Kopp Reich than I.  Second, it does my readers little good to hear me complain about an institution with which I have little, if any, connection.  So I’m offering an olive branch to Wendy Kopp.  Let’s play nice, shall we?  We can have a drink, a few laughs…we can both torture kids with standardized tests.

I just have one condition.  Please stop taking so many students from Georgetown.

The sidebar of the Education Week article, which covers the record number of applications from college seniors for TFA, also gave some stats on the class of 2009.  4,100 young people will be invading classrooms next year–which is little assurance to me, as my school may lose a couple of positions.  Georgetown University’s class of 2009 had 11 percent of the seniors apply for TFA.  It is considered the largest employers of graduates on campus, joining the likes of Brown, Emory, the University of Chicago and the University of Connecticut.

Now I’m not against my fellow Hoyas pursuing a career in education.  I worry because I know my own classmates.  Whereas most are pretty decent people, I don’t see a lot of them with the stamina for a classroom in a high-needs area.  Sorry, Chip, but teaching Algebra I at DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx is not like tutoring your 4th Form chums at Groton.  Also, a lot of my class was downright insufferable–the teachers’ pet type.  My kids would have a field day with these prizes.  It would be great to see that smarmy prick from my US Political Systems class get the heave-ho out a classroom window.

It must be a dismal economy that so many of my fellow Hoyas are opting for the TFA experience.  This, also, is a problem.  The economy is driving lots of people to service, but for the wrong reasons.  The teacher you want to keep is not the accounting major who’s waiting to ride out the unemployment numbers before landing the next seat at Goldman Sachs.  It’s the student who has the choice of any corporate cush-job in America, yet CHOOSES to join the noble profession of teaching. 

So Wendy, I have to ask: What’s with so many Hoyas?  Is the economy really that bad?  Or did Duke and Harvard send you to steal away talent so that their schools can get the plush jobs?  Is this payback for us taking John Thompson III away from Princeton?  Were you a Villanova fan in a past life?

I don’t know if we can ever have the answer.  Maybe it’s too complex for my union-addled mind.  What I do know is that the high rate of Hoya participation makes us look bad.  It makes us look like do-gooders and missionary-pariahs.  Its bad enough Georgetown alums are in positions at every level of government and business–positions that allow us to fuck things up in spectacular ways.  Now they’re marshalled into classrooms to teach children badly until the economy improves.  If societal destruction is your aim, we can do more damage in other sectors of society, like the White House.   

If you let in any more Hoyas, Wendy, make sure they really want to make a difference.  Otherwise, these kids will be wasting my kids’ valuable time–time they should be spending on their projects on the civil rights movement.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

This Day in History 5/27: Sinking the Bismarck

We haven’t done one of these in a while, and since we’re covering the Second World War with my older students, this seemed appropriate.

Today is the anniversary of the sinking of the German battleship Bismarck in the North Atlantic on May 27, 1941.  The ship was Germany’s latest big weapon in attempting to stop American relief shipments to Great Britain.  A veritable terror in its time, the Bismarck had engaged and sunk the British battle cruiser HMS Hood in the Battle of the Denmark Strait on May 24. 

With the loss of the venerable Hood, the British Navy vowed to “Sink the Bismarck!: by any means necessary.  Finally cornered in the North Atlantic, the Bismarck went down after a ferocious 3-hour shelling.  The wreckage of the Bismarck has since been excavated by Robert Ballard as well as Titanic director James Cameron.

Above is a video featuring Johnny Horton’s rendition of the song “Sink the Bismarck.”  Horton had a knack for historical songs, as he’s best known for “The Battle of New Orleans”, referring to the 1815 encounter featuring Andrew Jackson.  Definitely use the video as a welcome break from the end-of-year hubbub.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hold Your Gavels!: Our Top Supreme Court Rejects.

Like those of yore, Barack Obama’s  infant Presidency is filled with firsts:  first press conference, first foreign trip, first missile attack into a pesky Third World pariah. 

Now he can add his first Supreme Court nominee, with the appointment of federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor to the country’s highest bench.  Bronx-born, Puerto-Rican, female–Sotomayor is all things good Democrats smile about.  I like her as well, being that my students can have someone from the projects they can actually emulate who isn’t on MTV or in Rikers Island.  Plus, her vague voting record on hot-button issues can turn her into her predecessor, David Souter–a moderate in conservative clothing.

Before we pop the bubbly, however, there is a chance–a slim chance–that Sotomayor may not get the nomination.  If she does not, Sonia will not be alone.  34 nominees have been rejected since the first batch appointed by George Washington.  Let’s look at the memorable high court duds that have graced, or disgraced, our headlines, thanks to David Holzel’s article at Mental Floss, as well as the good folks at CQ Press and other sources.







Robert Bork – Children of the Eighties remember the facial hair alone–it made him look like an Amish villain in a James Bond film.  It wasn’t the only strike against him.   Ronald Reagan’s most famous appointee–after Sandra Day O’Connor–Bork lost largely because he voted and talked exactly as he thought, and he did it a lot.  A US Court of Appeals judge and a legal scholar, Bork produced reams of conservative opinions and legal reviews.  This didn’t mean he was a bad guy, but his liberal enemies made him out as a beast who eats minority children.  So the Amish Goldfinger lost after 12 days of contentous hearings.







Alexander Wolcott – We’re a year away from Revolution Round Two, or the War of 1812, and James Madison appoints the single most unpopular guy in the New World to the court.  Wolcott was defeated by widest margin of any nominee in history, 9-24.  The Connecticut customs inspector lost for two reasons: (1) he was a customs inspector, and never set foot inside a courtroom; and (2) He openly enforced two of the most unpopular laws in history, the Embargo and Non-Intercourse Acts.  These 1807 measures designed to prevent our getting sucked into the Napoleonic Wars actually caused widespread financial ruin, especially in his native Connecticut.  They were glad to see this bozo gone.










John Rutledge – Signer of the US Constitution, brother of a signer of the Declaration of Independence, John Rutledge had Chief Justice written all over him in 1795, when Washington appointed him to replace John Jay.  It was a recess appointment, and Rutledge had a few months to sit on the bench before the Senate would appoint him.  During that time, he decided to self-destruct.  He gave controversial speeches against the 1795 Jay Treaty, which normalized relations with Great Britain.  Rutledge also had been fighting alcoholism and bouts of insanity since his wife’s death.  When the Senate saw the rum-swilling, insane troublemaker in December, they made quick work of him, and rejected him on December 15. 








Douglas Ginsburg – After the Bork fiasco, Reagan attempted to quietly insert Anthony Kennedy as the nominee.  Conservatives in the Senate weren’t buying it, thus the Ginsburg situation.  Douglas Ginsburg was a conservative appellate judge with a solid record and one vice–marijuana.  Now, if this had been as a student, the Senate may have looked the other way, as they did with Clarence Thomas’ disclosure of pot use in law school.  The problem was that Ginsburg admitted to drape-smoking as an assistant professor at Harvard–thus, as a grown-up.  Grown-ups put away such childish things, Douggie (wink, wink) and the Senate agreed.










Ebenezer Hoar – The late 19th Century’s answer to Mike Hock and I.P. Freely.  Besides having an unfortunate name, Ebenezer had the altogether bigger problem of NOT being his namesake.  Ulysses Grant’s Attorney General lost his nomination approval because he was honest–pretty much the only honest man in Washington besides poor General Grant, himself.  A staunch advocate of civil service reform and merit advancement, Hoar was reviled by the Senate for not lining up to line their pockets with pork.  Hoar just couldn’t stoop to being a whore.








Wheeler Hazard Peckham and William B. Hornblower – These two poor guys were the victims of senatorial courtesy.  One of many unwritten rules of the Senate chamber is that a senator has the right to reject a court nomination simply because the nominee is from the senator’s home state.  In 1894, these New York attorneys were appointed by Grover Cleveland.  Just as quickly, Senator David Hill invoked his privilege to kill both nominations.










Caleb Cushing – Some nominees fail because they’re too conservative.  Some because they’re too liberal.  Cushing lost because no one could figure out where he stood on anything.  A former US Attorney General in the 1850s, Cushing was appointed by Ulysses Grant at the ripe old age of 74, which didn’t help matters.  During his career, Cushing was a Whig, a Tyler Whig, a Democrat, a Johnson Constitutional Conservative, and a Republican.  Being a political chameleon is okay today (think Bill Clinton) but political poison in the 19th Century.  Cushing made so many enemies on both sides that Grant just withdrew his name before the Senate could even vote. 

Maybe he should smoke a fat one with Ginsburg.  They could light their doobies with a flaming copy of the Dred Scott decision–finally putting it to good use.


Filed under Uncategorized