It just figures that the first day of the US Open at Bethpage Black gets rained out. It shares an anniversary with another unhappy accident.
Today is the 197th anniversary of the War of 1812, one of the strangest wars in American history. It’s been called many other names, such as the “Second War of Independence” or “Mr. Madison’s War”, after the sitting President James Madison. My favorite name for it, however, is the “War of Faulty Communication,” since a simple advance in technology would have prevented not only the war even being declared, but would also have stopped its largest battle from even starting.
The young United States was fighting largely for respect. Both Napoleonic France and Great Britain, in constant warfare since 1793, wanted to use the U.S. as leverage in trade and military gamesmanship. American trade suffered from British harrassment–especially the “impressment” of sailors–and French meddling. Furthermore, in defiance of the Treaty of Paris of 1783, the British remained in forts on America’s western frontier, providing arms and supplies for local Native groups to raid on encroaching American settlements.
Yet when Congress passed the war resolution on June 18, 1812, many of the major abuses by the British were being resolved. A month before, the prime minister died, and Lord Liverpool formed a new government, one which sought a more accomodating stance with the United States. On June 16, just two days before the declaration of war, Parliament voted to rescind many of the aggressive maritime measures that caused American anger in the first place. If there was even a telegraph line, let alone a phone or the Internet, this war would’ve never happened.
If you asked the generals on both sides, it shouldn’t have happened–not in their military conditions in 1812. Britain was in no shape to get into another conflict. It was busy in the Peninsular War in Spain against Napoleon, as well as leading the alliance against the French via the mainland, aiding their Continental allies as the French armies got stuck in Russia. Britain controlled the seas with its huge navy, but it was needed to blockade Europe, and few ships could be spared.
The United States was in worse shape. The standing army was only about 7,000, and recruits were hard to come by outside of the South and West. The war was extremely unpopular in New England, where they threatened secession if their commerce was further curtailed. The navy was virtually nonexistent: a whopping 14 ships, with 6 frigates and no heavy-hitting ships of the line, compared to Britain’s 600 vessel monster.
The war was concentrated on the high seas, the Great Lakes, the coastal towns of the Chesapeake Bay, the western frontier and the Gulf coast. Most battles were small affairs, especially in the west where the British had to use Canadian militia and native allies to buttress their small ranks. This changed in 1814, when the waning of the Napoleonic Wars allowed Great Britain to allocate more resources to the American front. This resulted in the burning of Washington, DC and the siege of Baltimore–the very same siege that gave birth to our national anthem.
By December of 1814, the war was tiring on both sides. Britain wanted to maintain a strong hand in shaping post-Napoleonic Europe, and the war in the Americas weakened its position among its allies Austria and Russia. The United States, meanwhile, wanted to end a costly conflict that had few clear victories and some disastrous defeats. Both sides signed the Treaty of Ghent on December 28, 1814, which ended the war.
Or did it?
Somehow, Andrew Jackson did not get the message. Maybe his DSL connection was down, or the network admin was doing maintenance. Instead, he decides to give the British the beating of a lifetime. On January 8, 1815, Jackson’s Americans soundly defeat an invading British force at New Orleans. It made Jackson a national hero, but it never should’ve happened. It wasn’t until the next month, when the British invaded Mobile, Alabama, that news reached the South of the peace treaty.
So what did the War of 1812 teach us, kids?
(1) Always check your messages. It’ll avoid unfortunate misunderstandings and prevent escalation of conflict. Jackson needed a Blackberry. Lord Liverpool should’ve Twittered his actions.
(2) Never get caught with your pants down. You’ll end up running like the US Army at the shameful Battle of Bladensburg in 1814. It was widely considered the worst defeat in US military history.
(3) Always get the “last licks.” The schoolyard prepares us for the battlefields of life. Jackson ended up with the last punch in 1815. In 1828, he’d be elected President.
Mr. D's Neighborhood 
Mortgaging Our Future: UFT agrees to cut Pension Benefits
Isn’t it great when politicians dress up a flagrant con job as a “cost-saving” measure?
As if teacher recruitment and retention isn’t bad enough in this city, along comes the cabal of Bloomberg, Klein and Weingarten–who sound like an ambulance-chasing law firm. They seem to feel that its better to keep the talent we have than to appeal to new, fresh faces to energize the teacher corps.
Today’s Daily News details the last great giveback of the Randi Weingarten era at the United Federation of Teachers. In exchange for two extra days of summer vacation, new hires will have their pension benefits slashed. Instead of paying 5% of their salary for 10 years and then dropping to 2%, all new teachers will be depositing 5% into the pension fund for the entirety of their tenure. Furthermore, new teachers will take longer to become “vested”–10 years as opposed to five–and will not be able to retire with full benefits until they have completed 27 years of service.
Both Mayor Michael Bloomberg and UFT president Weingarten are thrilled with this “compromise.” Bloomberg stated that “It will save us a lot of money over the long term – not as much right away. But we have to address the long-term problems now.” Weingarten was even more optimistic, calling it a “win for everyone.”
Really Randi? Is it a win for New York City schoolchildren in the future who, because of these backslides in protection, do not have quality teachers who stay for any length of time? Is it a win for prospective teachers who wish they could teach in our great city, yet are barred by a pension tier that treats newer hires as second-class employees? Or is it more a win for you, so you can keep in the good graces of Ayatollah Bloomberg and his bean-counter clerics?
Speaking of the dwarf-in-chief, Michael Bloomberg has some nerve calling this a cost-saving measure. He doesn’t see the long-term social costs in his policies, which lead to the very financial losses he’s trying to avoid. If teachers cannot be retained or hired, staff are left undermanned and with inadequate training. This, in turn, leads to ill-prepared children, regardless of what the Albany “cooked” tests have to say. As they enter the workforce, these students will not be entering the fields that generate more income or business for the city. Rather, many will enter the very same civil government positions that are the “cost cutting” in the first place.
This, of course, is an exaggerated scenario. Yet it seems that for the sake of the balance sheet, we are mortgaging the strength of our teacher corps and the well-being of our students. I really don’t care about two extra days–my principal will probably find a workshop to occupy that time, anyway. What concerns me is the sacrificing of today’s teachers without thought of its consequence. I’d rather have well-trained, knowledgeable teachers that can help students progress over a long period of time than two measly days.
It is downright sickening that this has been crafted as a “win-win”, when there are clear losers.
Leave a comment
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as Commentary, current events, Curriculum, Education, Educational leadership, Leadership, Media, Michael Bloomberg, New York City, news, Opinion, Randi Weingarten, Teachers, UFT